|
|
Post by dollylanedales on Jun 2, 2008 19:45:37 GMT -1
If I loaned a mare for breeding purposes, would the subsequent foal be under my prefix, or the owner of the mare?
|
|
|
|
Post by DalesLady on Jun 2, 2008 19:57:47 GMT -1
Yours mair i believe.
|
|
|
|
Post by lucydales on Jun 2, 2008 21:05:08 GMT -1
I would say it'd depend on who was keeping the mare and having the foal, but don't know!
Maggie/Zelda can probably tell us?
|
|
|
|
Post by dollylanedales on Jun 2, 2008 21:10:28 GMT -1
I would assume I would have the foal, and pay any fees involved including the covering fee. Well, thats what I would want, anyway!!
|
|
|
|
Post by zeldalithgow on Jun 2, 2008 21:18:21 GMT -1
Leia is on breeding loan with Maggie, the foal will be Maggies  |
|
|
|
Post by dollylanedales on Jun 2, 2008 21:30:02 GMT -1
Thank you Zelda - so that means I would have a foal with my prefix .....wouldn't I? owner would want to keep the mare through her pregnancy so technically she could say it was her foal in a way (not that I think she would LOL!)
Its just that she cannot afford the cost of covering etc. but she still would like the pleasure of following her mares pregnancy, which I would not mind.
Anyway, this is all in the future, got to see what happens with Molly mops this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by charliedales on Jun 3, 2008 20:06:13 GMT -1
We did this with Susie when Sarah had her on breeding loan, worked out well and we had a loan agreement set up re ownership of foals, costs etc
|
|
|
|
Post by dollylanedales on Jun 3, 2008 20:44:15 GMT -1
A loan agreement is a good idea - a year is a long time while waiting for a foal, and lots can happen/go wrong between the two parties. It would be awful if the mare owner changed their mind, but I suppose they could if they really wanted to.
Thank you for your good advice. I am just looking at options for next year, if the Molly breeding idea does not work.
|
|
